Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ridire Research's avatar

I’ve always been fascinated by the antigambling crowd. We all wake up and take hundreds of gambles a day, and not just the big ones. What to eat. Whether to skip the workout. Whether to open that email now or later. Whether to speak up or stay quiet. Whether to save, spend, or wait one more year. Even doing nothing is a bet that the world won’t change without you.

Risk isn’t some special activity people opt into it’s actually the default state. What’s changed is that the old, socially approved gambles stopped paying in a way people actually believe in. “Work hard, be patient, stay the course” used to feel like a reasonable bet. So when people move toward obvious, high-variance bets, it’s not because they suddenly love risk. It’s because like you mention they want agency, to choose their gamble instead of having one quietly imposed on them.

Telling people to “stop gambling” misses that completely. They’re already gambling. They’re just reallocating where. If that behavior is structural and not going away, the real asymmetry isn’t trying to beat the house. It’s owning the parts of the system that profit from activity itself. I wrote a related piece on that idea, basically own the casino rather than play in it, for anyone curious:

https://www.ridireresearch.com/p/own-the-casino

Expand full comment
cash's avatar

It's utterly insane that you were able to put this in words. This is the truth, it's the ugly that very few want to talk about and even fewer can even identify as a legitimate predicament (outsiders are oblivious)

I have to draw many similarities from degenning and the "golden handcuffs" of commission sales jobs, particularly door to door.

I hope that participants understand that the most important part of "finally winning" or hitting the play that "changes everything" is knowing when to leave the casino.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?