The Prison Of Financial Mediocrity
Introduction
I am not a stock picker. I worship at the altar of a large breadth of low confidence (<= 53% win-rate) bets, but I am absolutely betting the house that long degeneracy is the prevalent socioeconomic theme of the coming century.
It is why people above the age of 40 will recommend you to get better at your job and increase your salary, whilst everyone else seem to be ignoring exactly THAT and desperately clawing at something, ANYTHING that can give them a shot of outrageous success.
The easiest thing to sell to a crowd like this is “hope”, and when you understand this, you will understand the rise of the casinos (in all forms, dexes, prediction markets, etc) and the rise of trading gurus, business gurus, courses, and of course... substacks.
The Set-up
One doesn’t need to be locked up to be imprisoned. There is a generation walking around with invisible bars.
They know the life exists, the house, the stability, the reward for showing up and doing the right thing for thirty years. They know people have it. They just can’t imagine how to get there. Not “it’s hard”; they literally cannot construct a realistic path from where they are to where they’re supposed to end up.
The traditional path to wealth accumulation is closed. Not difficult. Closed. When boomers hold ~50% of national wealth while comprising 20% of the population, and millennials hold ~10% despite being the same share, the game reveals itself to be fundamentally broken.
The ladder got pulled up and it’s not like the boomers wanted to do this; asset price inflation just happened to benefit those who already owned assets. But the effect is the same.
The Collapse of the Traditional Bargain
The implicit deal used to be simple: show up, work hard, stay loyal, and you’ll be rewarded. Companies offered pensions. Tenure meant something. Your house appreciated while you slept. The system worked if you trusted it.
That deal is dead.
Staying at one company for 20 years is now a career liability, not an asset. Wages grew 8% while housing costs doubled and debt payments for young people increased ~33%. The math doesn’t support patience anymore.
Looking at the bigger picture, I used to think it was bad, but with the advent of AI and the economic impact they are going to have (even with current technologies), I think it is only going to get significantly worst.
When the system stops rewarding patience, people stop being patient.
Call it rational adaptation.
Push And Pull
Two forces are at work here.
The Pull
Modern society has mostly solved the bottom tiers of Maslow’s hierarchy. Food is cheap. Basic shelter exists. Safety, healthcare, baseline employment, not guaranteed, but accessible enough that most young people aren’t fighting for survival.
Previous generations facing economic constraint had a different problem. When you’re worried about eating, you don’t have bandwidth for existential questions. The grind makes sense because the alternative is starvation. You take the stable job, you stay quiet, you don’t rock the boat - because the boat is keeping you alive.
This generation doesn’t have that distraction.
When survival is handled, humans reach for the next tier: belonging, esteem, self-actualization. They want experiences. They want meaning. They want to feel like their life is going somewhere, not just continuing. And the traditional paths to those higher needs, home ownership, career progression, financial security, are exactly what’s been blocked.
Collectively, we are apes that are reflexively scratching at the scab of our higher order needs of actualization, and the blood won’t stop flowing but we literally don’t know how to do better.
The Push (and Why It’s Getting Worse)
AI is coming for white-collar jobs, and everyone knows it.
The anxiety isn’t hypothetical anymore. ChatGPT writes better copy than most junior marketers. Midjourney produces better visuals than entry-level designers. Cursor and Claude write code that passes review. This is now more or less universally accepted except by those with severe skill issues.
Every month brings new benchmarks showing AI matching or exceeding human performance on tasks that used to require expensive degrees and years of training.
White-collar workers, or otherwise the financially aspirational, are watching the timeline shrink. Three years ago, “AI will replace knowledge workers” was a thought experiment. Now it’s a planning assumption. Everyone’s asking when, not if, and the estimates keep getting shorter.
Then there’s social media, which ensures you’re never satisfied with where you are.
The algorithm is optimized to show you the next tranche of what could be. Always the vacation you haven’t taken. The apartment you can’t afford. The lifestyle one rung above yours. It doesn’t matter where you are on the ladder; there’s always someone above you, and the algorithm will find them.
Previous generations had limited visibility into how others lived. You compared yourself to your neighbors, your coworkers, maybe some celebrities in magazines. The reference class was narrow. Now the reference class is infinite. A 25-year-old making $70k is constantly fed content from people their age making $2mn, living in Bali, “working” four hours a day. The baseline for “enough” keeps moving.
You never catch up. No matter what you achieve, social media will show you what you’re missing. The spread between your life and the life you “should” have is maintained algorithmically, forever uncollapsible.
So you have AI shrinking your timeline AND social media ensuring you never feel like you’ve arrived. The pressure to escape, NOW, FAST, before it’s too late, compounds daily.
The anxiety is pervasive. Every white-collar worker has done the mental exercise: “Could AI do my job? When?” And most of them don’t love their answers. Even if they think they’re safe for now, “for now” keeps getting shorter.
So you have a generation that can’t afford the traditional milestones AND believes the traditional path might evaporate before they reach the destination anyway. Taking shots now, while the money and the opportunity still exist, is the rational response.
Why grind for 20 years toward a promotion that might not exist in 10?
The Maslow Trap
When you can survive but can’t get anywhere, something breaks. You’re not desperate enough to accept any deal, but you’re blocked from the deals that actually matter. The cognitive bandwidth that would have gone to survival instead goes to... frustration. Searching. Looking for any path that might lead somewhere.
Career progression isn’t just income, it’s purpose, identity, the feeling that your work matters. Financial security isn’t just money, it’s the freedom to take risks, travel, build, create.
When these paths close AND the timeline to achieve them shrinks, the pressure has to go somewhere. These prisoners need a way out, and BY GOD they need a way out NOW.
Agency In The Casino
I first saw it in the L1 Crypto; and dismissed it as a fad. Then I saw it again in NFTs, and then again and again in the entire shit show between NFTs and perp dexes and now, obviously, the “prediction markets supercycle”.
The same young people who can’t imagine grinding at one company will absolutely grind for months learning crypto trading. They will pour hours into understanding prediction markets to understand the very economy they believe wholeheartedly to be rigged. The same person who dismisses traditional investing as an “inside game” will bet their rent money on a memecoin.
Why?
Because the casino is the only place they feel agency. The only place where their decisions might actually unlock the next tier, on a timeline that matters.
Traditional career path? Your manager got promoted for being there first, not for being good, and your whole department might get automated anyway. Stock market? Sure, you can earn 10% annually and afford a house in 47 years, assuming your job still exists.
But crypto? Prediction markets? Sports betting? Your research actually matters here. Conviction pays. Even an imagined edge feels like yours, not something you’re waiting for someone to grant you. You’re placing bets where your judgment directly determines your results.
The house edge exists. Most people lose. I think MOST PEOPLE understand this. But they’re playing, not waiting for a future that might never arrive. The people preaching for these people to STOP GAMBLING have failed to understand the predicament of the prisoners, and always assume a kind of intellectual superiority that “you have negative edge”. My position is that I think the gamblers absolutely understand that.
The ones who say “gambling is bad, you should stop” are almost always the ones speaking from a privileged position of being in the financial upper class. They SEE a way out; they SEE a path. So they espouse the goodness and kindness of god on staying the path.
For the many imprisoned, gambling is their salvation, and you are literally telling them to accept a life of eternal damnation. That is why they rebel against you. That is why your well-intentioned advice falls on deaf ears.
What Do The Numbers Look Like?
Prediction Markets: Polymarket and Kalshi did $10B+ in volume in November 2025 alone. Combined annual volume is approaching $40B. In 2020 this was essentially zero. The growth rate is vertical.
Sports Betting: Legal sports betting revenue went from $248M in 2017 to $13.7B in 2024. Gen Z and Millennials account for 76% of betting activity. Activity on online sportsbooks rose 7% year-over-year for both cohorts.
TransUnion’s report identified these gamblers as “speculators”: urban renters, heavy users of crypto apps, concentrated in mobile trading platforms. Young people locked out of traditional wealth-building, seeking asymmetric payoffs in the only markets that offer them.
Economic Theory Supports This
When you’re trapped, your risk preferences change.
Economists call this “convex utility in losses”: when you’re already losing, you prefer a small chance of getting back to even over a certain moderate loss. It’s the same reason people double down at blackjack when they’re behind. It’s why lottery tickets sell better in poor neighborhoods.
My take is that social media and our higher order needs have conditioned people that are positioned well below the financial upper class to feel like they are already at a loss. The zeroth line has been repositioned. It is why you see unironic takes about the poverty line being at $150k. This generation isn’t gambling to survive, they’re gambling to actually have a life.
When your basic needs are met but your higher needs are blocked, money stops being about security and starts being about access. Access to experiences. Access to freedom. Access to the life you can see but can’t reach. A house isn’t just shelter; it’s the ability to have roots, build community, feel like an adult. Travel isn’t luxury; it’s the experience that makes life feel worth living.
For a generation that sees no realistic path to these things through conventional means, the expected value of a moonshot starts looking better than the expected value of grinding. If your baseline is “treading water forever,” then a PERCEIVED 5% chance of escaping is mathematically attractive against a 100% chance of staying stuck.
This isn’t financial illiteracy. It is revealed preference under constraint.
The memecoin degens, the sports bettors, the prediction market junkies, the trading guru subscriboors: they understand the odds are bad. They also understand their alternatives. When your options are “definitely stuck” or “probably stuck but with a small chance of being not,” the second option wins every time.
Long Degeneracy
So: what do you buy?
If this diagnosis is right, that a generation of economically locked-out young people will continue seeking agency through high-variance financial products, then you want to be long anything that serves that demand.
The platforms win regardless of whether the users win. You are looking for platforms that doesn’t care if you win your bet or if your prediction is right. You are looking for businesses that extract fees from activity, and activity is growing.
Entrepreneurship: The ‘escape the 9-5’ industrial complex is enormous and growing. Course creators selling dropshipping tutorials. Coaches selling agency models. Gurus selling ‘how I made $100k/month’ playbooks. ‘Start your own business’ is already the socially acceptable lottery ticket; it feels productive, agentic, like you’re building something. The fact that most entrepreneurs fail doesn’t dampen demand any more than bad odds dampen lottery sales.
Prediction markets: Polymarket is raising at an $8-10B valuation. The combined TAM people cite is “the entire betting industry,” over a trillion dollars. Even if that’s optimistic by 90%, it’s a massive market.
Crypto infrastructure: Custody, trading, staking, lending. Every new wave of speculators needs on-ramps. Coinbase, Robinhood’s crypto arm, specialized exchanges; they all benefit from volume regardless of direction.
Sports betting operators: DraftKings, FanDuel, and their infrastructure providers. Legal sports betting is still rolling out state by state. The regulatory moat is real.
Social trading and community: Discord servers, X/Twitter accounts, Substack newsletters that cater to this audience. The attention is there. The willingness to pay for alpha is there.
The bet isn’t that any individual speculator wins. The bet is that the phenomenon persists. That the underlying economic conditions driving young people toward high-variance bets don’t change. That the platforms extracting fees from this activity continue to grow with the audience. That the financially imprisoned will parlay one bet to another, to another, to another, one must imagine Sispyhus filling out his 401st lottery ticket.
Given what we know about AI acceleration, housing costs, wealth distribution, and generational economics... does this seem like a temporary thing?
The Moral Dimension
Look, this thesis is descriptive, not prescriptive.
Watching a generation seek financial salvation through lottery tickets, even sophisticated lottery tickets, isn’t something to celebrate. The fact that prediction markets and memecoins feel like the only path to agency is a symptom of something broken. The house wins. Most players lose.
But understanding what’s happening lets you position for it. Let’s you reflect on it.
The casinos of every era have profited from desperation. The desperation today is real, documented, and growing. The casinos are The Hope Sellers, Polymarket, Coinbase, DraftKings. They’re going to keep taking rake.
You can moralize about this or you can be long the platforms. It is unironically one of the ways you CAN get out.
Conclusion
I leave you a story...
There’s a guy I know, smart, works in tech, makes good money by any historical standard. Last month he “invested” $100k farming perp dex points. Not because he thought it was a good investment.
Because, and I quote: “What else am I gonna do, save for 20 years and buy a condo when I’m 55?”
I just know he’s waiting for the next dex to come around so he’ll do it again.
How many of you are doing something like this?
How many of you know someone doing something like this?
Long degeneracy.


I’ve always been fascinated by the antigambling crowd. We all wake up and take hundreds of gambles a day, and not just the big ones. What to eat. Whether to skip the workout. Whether to open that email now or later. Whether to speak up or stay quiet. Whether to save, spend, or wait one more year. Even doing nothing is a bet that the world won’t change without you.
Risk isn’t some special activity people opt into it’s actually the default state. What’s changed is that the old, socially approved gambles stopped paying in a way people actually believe in. “Work hard, be patient, stay the course” used to feel like a reasonable bet. So when people move toward obvious, high-variance bets, it’s not because they suddenly love risk. It’s because like you mention they want agency, to choose their gamble instead of having one quietly imposed on them.
Telling people to “stop gambling” misses that completely. They’re already gambling. They’re just reallocating where. If that behavior is structural and not going away, the real asymmetry isn’t trying to beat the house. It’s owning the parts of the system that profit from activity itself. I wrote a related piece on that idea, basically own the casino rather than play in it, for anyone curious:
https://www.ridireresearch.com/p/own-the-casino
It's utterly insane that you were able to put this in words. This is the truth, it's the ugly that very few want to talk about and even fewer can even identify as a legitimate predicament (outsiders are oblivious)
I have to draw many similarities from degenning and the "golden handcuffs" of commission sales jobs, particularly door to door.
I hope that participants understand that the most important part of "finally winning" or hitting the play that "changes everything" is knowing when to leave the casino.